EDUNET: The core of Korea’s Knowledge Bank
Overview of ICT initiatives in education
Rapid changes in society and technology, Web 2.0, globalization etc. has lead to a paradigm shift in education in Korea. As a result of the changes the educational sector had to change and innovate itself. As one solution to this demand Korea chose to use ICT to drive innovation in Education.
Policies of ICT use in education have been pursued through three Master Plans from 1996 to the present in order to achieve the goals of Korean education, which is to realize education welfare, enhance quality of education, offer equal opportunities to education, and equip itself with world-class competitiveness.
Make a note of the fact that Korea started out with “how the future education should be”. The major issues in each Master Plan were:
- Master Plan 1 (1996-2000), the major issue was to establish the ICT environment – the infrastructure in the classroom.
- Master Plan 2 (2001-2005), the major issues were to “enhance the effect and quality of education” through ICT integration and realize “education welfare” through promotion of e-Learning. The projects include: Education Resources Sharing System, Teaching and Learning Center, and Cyber Home Learning System (“Cyber Home Learning system” is a nationwide e-learning system).
- Master Plan 3 (2006-present) focus on customized learning and world-class competitiveness in education. The projects include a u-Learning pilot project and the development of digital textbook to meet future demands of Korean education.
| Master Plan 1 | MP2 | MP3 |
|
Teacher / 1 computer 17 students / 1 computer LAN, e-administrative network, internet PPP strategy |
5 student / 1 computer Upgrade network (2Mpbs) Broadband Expand PCs |
Ubiquitous computing: RFID, wireless, PDA, Tablet PC Wireless Internet Ubiquitous zone |
| Master Plan 1 | MP2 | MP3 |
|
Educational information service- portal: EDUNET ICT literacy training: CEO, teachers Teaching-learning content Research information system Multimedia library |
National teaching-learning center (runned by KERIS) Cyber Home Learning System Metadata standard EBS e-Learning project ICT innovative teacher training Teaching-learning software National Education Information System |
Integrated education service platform: EDUNET U-Learning model school ICT integrated curriculum e-Learning cluster e-Cyber security QA (quality assurance) Global partnership for EFA |

- The red line: From the beginning a national bureau was organised to take full responsibility for national ICT in education strategy. The ICT infrastructure was established with public-private partnerships. The national institutes designated to spearhead ICT in education were KMEC and KERIS. A regional bureau of ICT in education was established to expand central and regional government collaboration. In 2001 a regional centre for ICT in education was established.
- The green line: First the PC’s and other hardware investments. Then the school network was completed. The e-Learning infrastructure was completed during master plan II. At the moment the focus is on expanding the u-Learning infrastructure.
- The blue line: CAI content on computer issues was available from the beginning. Educational content was expanded with multimedia functions during master plan II. To expand the use of educational content, a metadata standard became a critical aspect. The answer was KEM 2.0 - Korea’s Metadata standard (at the moment it is in version 3.0). In the u-Learning era, it is important to use digital textbook with self-directed learning content.
- The purple line: Korea started with computer education in schools and implemented teacher training. During master plan II, Korea initiated ICT model schools and nurtured ICT innovative teachers. The ICT innovative teachers played a critical role in training other teachers.
- The orange line: The educational portal service named EDUNET was established together with a school administrative system. NEIS (National Education Information System) is an integrated system designed to provide access to all educational information by connecting all elementary and secondary schools.
| Year | Program Policy | Program Direction | Others |
| ’96~’00 (Master Plan I) | In 1997, established ICT training for teachers |
Pursued policies to enable more than 25% of all teachers to receive ICT training every year. Secured teachers’ abilities to utilize educational information and to develop educational material. |
340,000 trainees |
| ’01~’05 (Master Plan II) |
In 2001, intensify teacher training. Provided ICT training for school commissioners and leading teachers. |
Pursued policies to enable more than 33% of all teachers to receive ICT training every year. Shifted the goal of training from raising ICT literacy to enabling teachers to utilize ICT. |
580,000 trainees |
| ’06~ (Master Plan III) | Strengthened global cooperation in ICT training program, exchanges with other countries through joining hands with global firms. | Revise ICT training for teachers according to their career stages. Increased ICT application at places where teaching and learning activities take place. | Mandatory teacher training (Every 3yrs, 90hrs/yr) |
The teacher training strategy in Korea.
EDUNET

This diagram shows the functional aspects of EDUNET.

Earthquakes – a learning resource example from EDUNET (all the content is in Korean).

DAEDO Elementary School, Seoul, Korea is connected to EDUNET via federated search

Statistics for EDUNET.
Educational resources sharing process

The educational resources sharing process.

The quality assurance process.
| Process | Description | Type of content |
|
Verification by quality verification officers of MPOEs * Using quality verification system within the educational information sharing system |
Content quality verification according to 7 review points Judgment of the deletion, approval, and rewriting of information As of 2007, 300 quality verification officers are working at 16 MPOEs. |
Shared content |
| Automatic check by central quality verification system |
Automatic check of the validity of URLs Automatic review on the basis of day, week, and month |
Shared content |
| Content quality verification by central monitor officers |
Deletion of hazard information, unethical criticism, and false information Verification of the validity of information As of 2007, 16 designated central monitor officers are working |
Shared & Unshared content |
| Error reporting by general users |
Based on 7 review points, immediate error reporting is possible by general users In 2007, 268 errors are reported |
Shared & Unshared content |
The 300 verification officers: some are from schools, other from universities and local administration. They work part time.
It takes less than 3 months for a learning resource to pass through quality assurance, which is from the user to the national knowledge bank. To keep up with the number of resources submitted it could be necessary to have more persons working with quality assurance in the future.
The seven review points are:
- Are the selected data, title, and explanation in agreement?
- Are the attached images relevant to the applicable data?
- Is the data classification appropriate?
- Is the curriculum appropriate?
- Is the copyright information, including copyright agency and author, exact?
- Are the attached files downloadable?
- Do the downloaded files correspond to the applicable data?
Assessment of EDUNET
Future challenges
- Expanding educational resource sharing and distribution through, institutional, regional and cross boarder partnership.
- Encourage sharing educational resources at home and abroad.
- Facilitate development of educational resource based on open source.
- Service operation more adaptable to user participation.
- Strengthen personalized and customized services for increased user satisfaction.
- Reinforcing the UCC and building a quality control-based system by users.
- Management of Intellectual Property Right.
- Continuous education to change awareness to IPR and copyright in schools.
- Increase awareness to multiculturalism: localization.
- Collaboration in addressing interoperability.

